I have no photos to show you today, but I did rediscover an interesting quote.
“What really knocks me out is a book that, when you're all done reading it, you wish the author that wrote it was a terrific friend of yours and you could call him up on the phone whenever you felt like it. That doesn't happen much, though.”
― J.D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye
Fiction is so fascinating to me in what it tells you about humanity, society, and the author themselves. I love when a book provokes you to deeper thought and I've definitely experienced the feeling of yearning to know what an author meant by certain comments and why they introduced certain subjects.
Absolutely. So, how do we solve this predicament? I want all of you to become published writers. I already know I'd be blown away by what you create :3
ReplyDeleteHehe.
In any case, I agree. Fiction has the potential to provoke one to deeper thought, but there are those books that may not do so...are they worth reading? What is the difference between good fiction and bad fiction? O.o Hmmm...
I disagree. There is no such thing as bad fiction, at least not entirely. The value lies in the reader and I believe that there is information to be gleaned or understandings to be made from any book.
DeleteI agree with the Nicole. :)
DeleteI think I agree for the most part too. I just find it hard to say that all books are equally as valuable. If they were, it would be awfully hard to prioritize D: In any case, I was not saying that there is bad fiction. Your post seemed to beg that question, which is why I posed it. Also it seems to me that some books are read solely for entertainment. I mean, I do believe everything has the potential to provoke deeper thought, but some books seem not to be targeting an audience that wants to gain a better understanding of life. Anyway, I'm not exactly sure what I'm saying. Perhaps someone can help me play Devil's advocate (:
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI know what you mean, but I won't be helping you play Devil's advocate on this one. I look at books as stories, and stories as perspectives, and perspectives as people. And I cannot and will not say that any people are more valuable than others. Even if they seem to be living on the surface. There is always an opportunity to go deeper. How does one judge 'value' anyway? Does it not differ from person to person, from place to place? If you do not find value in a text, perhaps you should not blame it, but, rather, yourself.
ReplyDelete